Indeed, customers have accepted it and now are
demanding more from it. Meeting these demands requires sophisticated, complex
systems that can’t be successfully installed and configured by only moderately
trained personnel, nor by using only simple interfaces.
Vendors are beginning to concede this fact and are
preparing to make the necessary level of expertise broadly available. While end
users, channel partners and industry analysts likely will cry foul at first,
this trend is actually beneficial and, properly managed, will result in happier
customers, wealthier channel partners, and healthier revenues for vendors.
Thin Whizards
Pretty GUIs and friendly wizards have become standard
in VoIP management, but heretofore these interfaces have simply been a thin
veil for configuring very TDM-like PBX/key system features, especially in the
branch and small enterprise environment.
Now the veil has been lifted, and end users and
resellers alike see that these GUI tools aren’t focused on any of the
productivity drivers that enable an IP system, such as presence and
IP-to-network connectivity.
And the friendly wizards are only getting the
customers going with the most basic configurations.
Now that users have recognized and embraced the need
for all the productivity benefits VoIP systems can provide, the management
tools necessarily must become more complex to allow configuration of
sophisticated services.
Those tools, however, are frighteningly complex and
tricky, and the vendors have too few experts on staff to coach installers on
their use.
A friend of mine who was taking a sneak peek at the
Call Manager Express 4.0 commented that, “There appears to be exactly two
individuals at Cisco who have a clue about how to make it work. I don’t know
how Cisco is going to pull this off without some incredible knowledge transfer
system.”
No doubt this is something of an exaggeration voiced
in a fit of frustration-induced pique, but it is revealing nonetheless.
Growing Dilemma
To be fair, Cisco isn’t the only one facing this
situation. Alcatel, Avaya, Nortel, Siemens and others do as well to varying
degrees, both in enterprise and SMB systems.
And VoIP installations are going to continue to grow
more complex and therefore difficult as rank-and-file businesses adopt IP
technology and require more sophisticated security, dial plans,
interoperability and calling features.
All VoIP vendors must assume responsibility for
providing expertise to install and support the seemingly infinite combinations
of VoIP platform configurations and applications.
Having expert professional services, managed services
and outsourcing offerings in place—both direct and through channel partners—is
going to be essential moving forward. But they have to be implemented properly
or everyone from resellers to customers is going to be seriously annoyed.
The good news is that VoIP vendors recognize that for
now at least, the days of “simple” configuration with a “friendly” interface
that meets most customers’ needs are gone.
VoIP Professionals
VoIP vendors are acknowledging—in their actions if not
always in their words—that VoIP system configuration is a job for
professionals.
They also realize they don’t have enough thoroughly
trained professionals to meet the demand and know this shortage of qualified
VoIP configuration experts will affect sales if they don’t do something about
it.
And “do something about it” means developing their
channel organizations into armies of highly trained VoIP configuration
professionals.
Plan of Attack
So what’s a VoIP vendor to do?
First, price and schedule partner training reasonably.
Remember, these folks are taking their best SEs and salespeople away from
generating revenue to learn what they need to know to sell your product
profitably.
Next, strike a deal with partners on managed and
outsourced services. This is a source of channel conflict, plain and simple. Deal
registration is critical, and a standard offer of direct assistance from
corporate—and a related policy of how revenue will be adjusted in return—is
crucial.
Also, avoid corporate imperialism. Channel partners
have a right to self- determination, and you have a right to benefit from it.
Vendors should reward channel partners who develop
unique, effective service offerings.
That knowledge should then be standardized and
refranchised throughout the vendor’s partner organization—for a licensing fee,
a portion of which should go back to the partner who developed the new
methodology or service. This will have partners competing to create the most
innovative services for you.
Finally, resolve channel conflict over services now. Map
out the services that will be offered directly and those that will be offered
via resellers.
Be Innovative
And consider the unthinkable: What about selling all
services 100 percent through channels? A combination of the franchise
agreement, along with an intensive technical training program and a thorough
branding agreement could get your services sold more broadly and at a greater
profit than ever.
The challenge here is to ensure that channel partners
get a piece of the services opportunity that these resellers can get excited
about—and can handle expertly.
Cisco has made a first step by requiring that channel
partners be able to provide lifecycle services. The news was treated with great
consternation at the Cisco Partner Summit in San Diego, but it’s really a blessing in
disguise.
Embrace the Opportunity
Channel partners should embrace the services
opportunity. Although offering expert services requires a significant training
investment, it is definitely where the profit lies.
Second, demand the right to create your own service
offerings based on your vendors’ training, but allow the vendor to refranchise
it through its reseller organization—in return for a licensing fee back to you,
of course.
Channel partners are going to have to become sponges
for the massive knowledge transfer that needs to take place to be able to sell
its VoIP systems.
The effort will pay off, as my Call Manager Express
4.0 testing friend said, “Once you’ve got it all sorted out, you can do some
pretty cool things—things you simply can’t do with a monolithic GUI that only
allows specific structures. But getting there is a supreme PITA.”