By Johna Till Johnson, Network World Governments around the world are wrestling with the impact of VoIP on telecom regulation. Some treat VoIP as just another way to deliver telephony services (and subject to all the taxes and regulatory constraints of legacy voice). Others view it as an emerging technology that has to be carefully nurtured, and therefore protected from taxes and regulatory constraints. At the moment, the U.S. government seems to be leaning toward the "just another way to deliver telephony" perspective. As I pointed out last week, the FCC is looking to apply Universal Service Fund taxes to VoIP. The courts have similarly decided recently that VoIP is covered under the Communications Assistance for Law Enforcement Act (CALEA) - meaning that providers such as Vonage and Skype need to provide wiretapping hooks like those from AT&T, BellSouth and Verizon. And the U.S. House of Representatives just passed the "Communications Opportunity, Promotion, and Enhancement (COPE) Act of 2006" (H.R. 5252), stipulating that VoIP providers must ensure that 911 and E-911 services are provided to VoIP subscribers. Overseas, however, the situation is decidedly more mixed. Although VoIP remains officially banned in China, word on the street is that the Chinese are planning to rethink their strategy, possibly as early as this year. (No word on whether the Chinese equivalent of CALEA will apply.) And while Russia just moved to regulate VoIP, the Philippine and Indian governments have taken steps to loosen VoIP regulations. But the folks who are furthest ahead are the Europeans. Earlier this month, the heads of some 30 of the largest formerly state-owned telcos asked the EU Information Commissioner to level the playing field by - get this - lifting the regulatory burden imposed on incumbents, rather than introducing more regulation for new players. What a novel concept: Deregulate all of telecom, not just VoIP!